Mid. Tenn. State
Men
-
Women
2016
-
2017 -
2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
723 |
Julia Jelagat |
FR |
21:09 |
763 |
Agnes Abu |
JR |
21:12 |
884 |
Rachel Kigen |
SO |
21:20 |
1,537 |
Sharon Kibiwott |
SO |
22:02 |
1,768 |
Gladys Kipchumba |
FR |
22:18 |
2,534 |
Abike Egbeniyi |
SO |
23:20 |
|
National Rank |
#176 of 348 |
South Region Rank |
#18 of 47 |
Chance of Advancing to Nationals |
0.0% |
Most Likely Finish |
17th at Regional |
National Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 10 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 20 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Regional Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 in Regional |
0.0% |
Top 10 in Regional |
0.7% |
Top 20 in Regional |
94.2% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Julia Jelagat |
Agnes Abu |
Rachel Kigen |
Sharon Kibiwott |
Gladys Kipchumba |
Abike Egbeniyi |
Commodore Classic |
09/16 |
1120 |
21:11 |
20:40 |
21:02 |
21:45 |
22:19 |
23:28 |
Louisville Classic (Gold) |
09/30 |
1124 |
20:41 |
21:08 |
20:54 |
21:43 |
23:09 |
23:23 |
Crimson Classic |
10/13 |
1225 |
21:10 |
21:20 |
21:35 |
|
21:51 |
23:12 |
Conference USA Championship |
10/28 |
1230 |
21:38 |
22:08 |
21:16 |
21:56 |
22:18 |
23:16 |
South Region Championships |
11/10 |
|
|
|
21:25 |
22:28 |
22:11 |
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
NCAA Championship |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region Championship |
100% |
16.7 |
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
0.7 |
1.6 |
3.8 |
4.7 |
8.0 |
9.5 |
16.3 |
20.1 |
14.0 |
9.8 |
5.9 |
3.6 |
1.7 |
0.5 |
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results
Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Julia Jelagat |
64.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
Agnes Abu |
69.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
Rachel Kigen |
80.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sharon Kibiwott |
132.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gladys Kipchumba |
150.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abike Egbeniyi |
216.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
6 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
7 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
8 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
9 |
0.1% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
9 |
10 |
0.7% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
10 |
11 |
1.6% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
11 |
12 |
3.8% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
12 |
13 |
4.7% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
13 |
14 |
8.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
14 |
15 |
9.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
15 |
16 |
16.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.3 |
|
|
16 |
17 |
20.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.1 |
|
|
17 |
18 |
14.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
18 |
19 |
9.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
19 |
20 |
5.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
20 |
21 |
3.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
21 |
22 |
1.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
22 |
23 |
0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
23 |
24 |
0.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
24 |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
Total |
100% |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Received By Beating | Chance Received | Average If >0 | Average |
|
Total |
|
|
0.0 |
|
Minimum |
|
|
0.0 |
Maximum |
|
|
0.0 |